喺奧地利不幸遇到以下情況,你嗌都冇用.因為唔係犯法...
Pressure is growing against a decision by prosecutors not to charge a man with sexual harassment after he pinched a woman's bottom, because sexual harassment can only involve a woman's breasts or genitals.
The bizarre ruling has enraged many people not just feminist groups and this week many took to the streets in Graz where some of the women turned the tables by symbolically using a fake hand to pinch men on the bottom.
Graz woman's affairs spokeswoman Maggie Jansenberger said: "The men that I symbolically touched on the bottom with the fake hand did turn round very quickly which to me indicated that it was unpleasant. It was an infringement of their bodily integrity."
She added that when a man is told no and carries on anyway – that is harassment - and the courts and prosecutors needed to accept that.
Prosecutors had dropped sexual harassment charges because the bottom is "not regarded as a sex organ".
The incident happened at the start of October when the 43-year-old woman who works in a bank in Graz was waiting at a crossing when a man came alongside and said: "Wow, a woman with a fantastic arse, can I touch it?"
When she told him no he grabbed her backside anyway and squeezed.
The woman, who is the mother of two children, said that she had slapped him and tried to run away and then he had run after her and threatened her. She said: "He told me that he would not accept being hit by a woman." Police intervened and the woman pressed charges of sexual assault.
Local prosecutor Hansjörg Bacher however said that the charges had been dropped because the conditions that needed to be met had not been fulfilled.
He said: "The incident itself needs to involve physical contact with sexual parts, simply touching the woman on the bottom does not qualify as sexual harassment. That would not have been the case if he had for example grabbed her breasts or touched her improperly in the sexual region."
The woman said the decision by prosecutors was a second insult completely incomprehensible. She said that she had had to get counselling after the very public assault by the man and is demanding they reconsider the decision."
www.austriantimes.at 12 Nov 2012
因為奧地利Graz法院裁定,畀人搣pat
pat唔係性騷擾.
pat唔係性騷擾.
當然有人抗議啦!
另外以下呢個奧地利傢具店廣告我唔係好明同間舗有乜關係.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
咁都得?會唔會鼓勵多咗人做呢個動作呢?
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 00:02:08]真係唔知會唔會多咗. 唯有好好保護自己.
嘩..咁你咪可以肆無忌憚
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 04:18:57]我驚有人摸我呢個靚仔多d
有冇搞錯
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 04:19:43]你半個西人都覺得有冇搞錯呢.
有冇箭豬裙賣呀?
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 04:21:04]我估d人要著好似個罩咁o既公主裙出街先得
係寫字樓咁都得,有無攪錯.
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 07:49:01]冇犯法架.
o吾怪得米國「黑仔頓」總統死口都o吾認同「來溫司機」發生過性關系﹐因為口o吾算系sexual organ.
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 08:06:51]好可能係呢個point喎.
靚仔,你以後要厚啲嘅牛仔褲出街呀
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 16:29:58]我咁靚仔我估要著好似個罩咁o既公主裙出街先得la.
咁都得,啲女士出街小心啲啦
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/16/2012 16:28:29]好似我呢d靚仔都要小心d.
咁放肆
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:37:37]小心小心
傻架,咁都得!
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:37:46]小心小心
噢,咁都得。真係有無攪錯呀。
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:37:52]小心小心
咁男仔受害者又點計?
回覆刪除歐洲真係道德淪亡, 唔怪得之我上次入德國國會大樓嗰時, 個食蕉可以咁明目張膽咁摸我 pat 啦!!
[Swedish Hongkongese回覆12/17/2012 02:27:20]正常既男人個 pat 嗰個位梗係收埋D嘢架啦, 咪就係收埋條底底囉.
[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:40:16]男女平等. 男受害者我估都冇得嗌
食蕉咁明目張膽...好可能你個pat同你個人唔成比例.懷疑你收埋d o野呢.
pat pat 都唔算 sex organ ? 唔通佢地唔肛交,咁都overrude ,真係O 咀
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:41:24]咁係真個喎. 唔會有人話pat pat係sex organ. 有人會用口,咁口都唔係sex organ啦.
好過份耶! 奧地利係文明國家,點解會咁! 一定要抗議!
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:42:05]奧地利人思想另類.
咁都得
回覆刪除咁你有冇試過呀
[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:42:32]我想試做受害者
所以外國D道德標準真係好難理解...
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:42:46]思想另類.
奧地利啲交通工具有冇香港嗰啲咁逼人? 蝕底咗都冇得告喎.
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 01:44:07]繁忙時間都迫架. 但係唔見好似HK咁有色狼囉.
你試下先啦
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/17/2012 03:01:55]我保護咗我自己先啦.
如果香港係咁就C囉..
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/19/2012 05:25:11]如果係咁,個個出街都要加個厚墊
可能那個個案有灰色地帶, 所以法庭才判性騷擾不成立呀? 這並不代表所有摸patpat都可行呀
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/19/2012 05:30:05]似乎我呢度摸人patpat冇人拉你架.
吓 !!! 比人摸pat pat 都唔算係性騷擾 , 有冇攪錯呀 , 唔通個法官鍾意比人摸0既
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/19/2012 23:08:47]可能係倒轉,佢鍾意摸人.
攪錯呀, 咁都唔算性騷擾?!
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/21/2012 00:55:28]咪係!!
如果patpat 唔算 sex organ, 咁摸腿, 撫臉, 攬腰, 接吻都可以啦! 咁仲唔成性騷擾, 非禮!
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/21/2012 00:56:51]可能冇非禮呢樣o野.
以為賣強力膠水兼 punish 非禮者
回覆刪除[版主回覆12/24/2012 05:23:55]